AI Investigation Workflow

From Alert to ResolutionFully Autonomous

Watch how our AI agents powered by Claude Sonnet 4.5 and LangGraph orchestrate complex security investigations—triaging alerts, gathering context, analyzing threats, and executing responses without human intervention.

The Autonomous Investigation Lifecycle

From alert ingestion to threat resolution in seconds, not hours. Our AI agents handle the entire investigation workflow autonomously.

1
Step 1

Alert Ingestion

Alerts stream in from 300+ integrated security tools (SIEM, EDR, Firewall, etc.) via webhooks and APIs.

Real-time event processing
Multi-source correlation
Deduplication & normalization
~50ms ingestion latency
2
Step 2

AI Triage

Claude Sonnet 4.5 analyzes alert severity, context, and business impact to prioritize investigations.

Severity scoring (0-100)
Confidence scoring (>98%: auto / 80-98%: review / <80%: escalate)
Priority queue assignment
Confidence-based routing
3
Step 3 • Core

Investigation

LangGraph orchestrates hybrid investigations—parallel context enrichment followed by iterative threat hunting, log analysis, and attack narrative construction.

Dynamic tool selection
Context enrichment
Threat hunting & IOCs
2-5 min investigation time
4
Step 4

Response

AI executes response actions based on severity and your autonomy settings—from alerts to full remediation.

Automated containment
Ticket creation & routing
Stakeholder notifications
Levels 0-5 autonomy

LangGraph Investigation Workflow

Our agentic AI doesn't follow rigid playbooks—it dynamically adapts its investigation path based on what it discovers, just like a senior analyst.

1

Alert Analysis

Claude analyzes the alert, extracts IOCs (IPs, domains, hashes), and determines initial investigation scope.

2

Dynamic Tool Selection

Based on alert type, AI selects appropriate tools: SIEM queries, EDR telemetry, threat intel lookups, user context.

3

Hybrid Investigation Flow

After parallel context enrichment, AI performs iterative reasoning—analyzing findings, forming hypotheses, and pivoting investigation based on discoveries.

4

Verdict & Response

AI generates attack narrative, assigns confidence-scored verdict (e.g., "Likely False Positive - 92% confidence"), and routes accordingly.

Why LangGraph?

Traditional SOAR platforms use rigid "if-this-then-that" playbooks. Our LangGraph-powered agents use agentic reasoning—they think, adapt, and make decisions like human analysts.

Context-Aware

Agents remember findings across investigation steps and use context to make better decisions.

Self-Correcting (with Guardrails)

AI pivots investigation when initial hypothesis is wrong. Max 15-step limit prevents runaway loops; graceful handoff to analyst if needed.

Explainable

Full reasoning chain visible—see every decision the AI made and why it made it.

Customizable

Configure investigation depth, tool access, and autonomy levels per alert type.

Powered by Claude Sonnet 4.5

Extended thinking, tool use, and reasoning capabilities enable complex multi-step investigations that would take human analysts hours to complete.

Manual vs Autonomous Operations

See the dramatic difference in speed, accuracy, and analyst experience.

Before: Manual Operations

Traditional SOC workflow

45-60 min average investigation time

Analysts manually query 5-10 different tools, copy-paste data, correlate events.

60-70% false positive rate

Alert fatigue leads to missed threats, alert suppression, and analyst burnout.

Limited 24/7 coverage

Alerts during off-hours wait until next shift, increasing dwell time.

Inconsistent investigation quality

Varies by analyst experience—junior analysts miss context senior ones would catch.

67% analyst burnout rate

Repetitive triage work, alert overload, and on-call stress drive high turnover.

~200 alerts/day

Only 10-15 investigated thoroughly

After: FortMind Autonomous SOC

AI-powered operations

2-5 min autonomous investigation

AI uses hybrid execution—parallel context enrichment (IP rep, threat intel) followed by iterative threat hunting—90% faster.

Confidence-based triage (>98%/80-98%/<80%)

High-confidence verdicts auto-resolve; medium-confidence alerts prepare summaries for review; low-confidence escalates immediately.

True 24/7/365 coverage

AI never sleeps—every alert investigated immediately, no backlog, no shift handoffs.

Consistent senior-level quality

Every investigation follows best practices—no variation in depth or accuracy.

Analysts focus on strategic work

No more triage grind—analysts do threat hunting, architecture, and high-value analysis.

~200 alerts/day

ALL investigated automatically

90%
Time Reduction

From 45 minutes per alert to 2-5 minutes—freeing your team to focus on what matters.

Real-Time Investigation Dashboard

Watch investigations unfold in real-time with full transparency into AI reasoning.

Active Investigations

Suspicious Login
Active
Step 3/7 • Querying EDR telemetry
Malware Detection
Queued
Waiting for priority slot
Port Scan Alert
Complete
Verdict: False Positive (2 min ago)

Investigation: Suspicious Login

Alert ID: #A-2847
Alert Received
Okta suspicious login from 203.0.113.45 (Singapore)
2 minutes ago
Threat Intel Lookup
IP reputation: Clean (VirusTotal, AbuseIPDB)
1 minute ago
...
Querying EDR
Checking for process anomalies on target host...
In progress
4
User Context Check
Pending: Verify user location & recent activity
AI Reasoning

"Login from Singapore matches user's known location. However, timing is unusual (3 AM local time). Checking EDR for host-based indicators before making verdict..."

Ready to See It in Action?

Book a live demo and watch our AI agents handle real security alerts in real-time—from triage to resolution.

No credit card required
Setup in 15 minutes